Is it wrong that my Biology Textbook has a paragraph about God?

In the "origin of life on Earth" section, my biology textbook says that science does not concern itself with investigating the supernatural, so God cannot be proven or disproven by science. Is this a violation of the separation of church and schoolsIs it wrong that my Biology Textbook has a paragraph about God?
It's correct, and it's not violating the separation of church and schools. It is enforcing it.
No, it's a violation of God. There should at least be a chapter covering Intelligent Design.



I think it requires far more "blind faith" to believe in an unseen, unknown, unprovable, hidden in the mists of time "singularity" that possibly existed before time and before all other existence, and possibly similar to a black hole that remains inexplicable. Then, with out probable cause and possibly by spontaneous ignition, the compressed Singularity explodes causing the Big Bang. Then from the contents of the former singularity the entire Cosmos is created. Over much time, possibly millions or even billions of years, non-living matter somehow (?) becomes alive and forms microscopic organisms which begin to evolve into more complex organisms and eventually develop into the vast complexity and variety of living forms today. All the while defying the law of irreducibility, the 2nd law of thermodynamics and they also manage to do this without leaving any fossil evidence.



Micro-evolution is an observable fact, however it does not prove or confirm macro-evolution.





Scientists and evolutionists who blindly believe in the theory of Evolution ignore the lack of fossil evidence that is necessary to prove its original hypothesis and the observable fact that no living form has ever been able to transform into a different type of life form, i.e. viruses mutate but they remain viruses, cats and dogs become different breeds but remain cats and dogs, apes and man evolve according to the conditions we live in but remain apes and mankind.



Evolution requires a great deal more of "blind faith" than believing in the Creator God. However, even if hypothetically there was no God, then that would still not make macro-evolution a plausible theory.Is it wrong that my Biology Textbook has a paragraph about God?
If it weren't for the overwhelming belief in God around the world, I'd say it would be inappropriate. But given that so many people believe in it, that disclaimer seems warranted to me.
it seems to be an indifferent attitude towards an attempt to answer obvious questions by children with faith. i believe it is the most common answer from officials. and would prob be he most mature answer agreed upon by both christian/atheist parents and christian/atheist teachers.Is it wrong that my Biology Textbook has a paragraph about God?
The statement is kinda right, but mentioning God at all is a bit....too much? I dunno what's the word. They just shouldn't have mentioned God in the first place.
No, it's correct.
If it's in a public school, yes. Violation of separation of church and state.
ur not supposed to mention God in scientific texts i think...
burn that ****... Holy crap dude i would fail that class or ******* burn it like Rev. Jones with a koran